Sign in
Book a walkthrough
Solutions by sector

Five sectors, one platform

The differences between them sit in the workflow rather than in the software. A funding panel and an ethics committee need different stages, different permissions and different records. They do not need different systems.

Sector

Journal publishing

Reviewer fatigue and time to decision, across several article types in every title, with integrity expectations rising each year.

Journal peer review →
Sector

Research funding and grants

Thousands of proposals inside a fixed window, scored by panels that have to stay conflict free and survive an appeal.

Funding and grant review →
Sector

Government and public sector

Evaluations that have to hold up under audit and freedom of information, and clear an IT security review before anyone can use them.

Public sector review →
Sector

Healthcare and clinical review

Protocol and case review involving patient identifiable material, committee quorum rules, and amendment cycles a regulator may ask to see.

Clinical and protocol review →
Sector

Corporate research and development

Ideas arriving in every format from every region, with IP sensitivity limiting who can see what and a stage gate tied to the budget cycle.

Innovation review →

Accreditation cycles, award nominations, conference abstracts and internal approvals all run on the same platform. Tell us the process and we will show you the workflow.

Looking for this by role instead? Authors, editors, reviewers and boards each see a different part of the same process.

Browse by role
Get started

Tell us what you review.
We will show you the workflow.

Send us the outline of your process and we will build it in a session with you.

Book a walkthrough
See pricing