Solutions by sector

Protocol and clinical review

Committee review involving patient identifiable material, quorum rules that have to hold, and amendment cycles a regulator may ask to see in full.

Three things that are true here and nowhere else

01

The material is sensitive before it is anything else

Identifiable data inside a review changes who may see what, and what may be stored, where, and for how long.

What PeerPath doesAccess is granted per field and per file, by role and by stage, rather than per person and per system.
02

Quorum is a rule rather than a guideline

A decision taken without quorum is not a decision, whatever the minutes say.

What PeerPath doesThe rule is held by the system, and conditional approval is a real state rather than a note in the minutes.
03

Amendments never stop

A protocol is approved and then it changes, and each amendment needs a review of its own.

What PeerPath doesAmendments re enter at committee review with the original approval intact behind them.
Protocol submissionGovernance checkCommittee reviewQuorum decisionConditional approvalAmendmentReturned to applicantGovernance issues listedAmendment cycle
A worked example

A protocol review, with conditional approval and an amendment cycle

Conditional approval is a real state rather than a note in the minutes, so the conditions travel with the protocol. Amendments re enter at committee review rather than starting over, and the original approval stays intact behind them.

The four capabilities this sector leans on

Submission management

Field level control over what is collected and what is stored.

Submission management

Peer review workflows

Quorum rules, conflict declarations and conditional approval states.

Peer review workflows

Collaboration and communication

Committee discussion kept inside the record, not in inboxes.

Collaboration and communication

Data management

Retention per study type, with disposal logged when it happens.

Data management

Different people ask different questions of the same process. The role pages answer them one constituency at a time.

What buyers in this sector often ask

How is patient identifiable material handled?

Access is granted per field and per file, so a reviewer sees what they need in order to judge and not what they do not.

How granular is access control?

Down to the individual form field and attachment, by role and by stage.

Do you handle GDPR special category data?

Yes, with the processing agreement and sub processor list you would expect. The security page covers both.

What retention periods can we set?

Whatever your governance requires, per study type, with disposal logged when it runs.

Can it connect to our CTMS or EDC?

Through the API. There is no packaged connector today, and we would rather say so than imply one exists.

Get started

Tell us what you review.
We will show you the workflow.

Tell us how your committee works. We will configure it and show you the result.